Women bishops for Australia (perhaps)


From the Anglican Church of Australia’s media outlet:

The Anglican Church’s highest legal authority, the Appellate Tribunal, has cleared the way for the consecration of women as diocesan bishops across Australia.

In a majority decision the Tribunal has ruled that there is nothing in the Church’s Constitution that would prevent the consecration of a woman priest as a diocesan bishop in a diocese which by ordinance has adopted the Law of the Church of England Clarification Canon 1992. Not every diocese has done so.

The ruling impacts only on diocesan bishops and not assistant bishops most of whom are elected and confirmed under provisions of the Assistant Bishops’ Canon 1966 which seems to retain the requirement for candidates to be male.

One of the central issues in the ruling allowing women to become diocesan bishops concerned the definition of ‘canonical fitness’. In the Church’s Constitution, adopted in 1962 it was clear at that time canonical fitness included a requirement for ‘maleness.’

The ‘maleness’ requirement was removed in a process that began in 1989 when a canon (church law) was passed that amended the Constitution to redefine ‘canonical fitness.’ The canon came into effect in 1995 after 75% of dioceses, including all metropolitan dioceses, adopted it.

The Tribunal, made up of three diocesan bishops and four lay people, experienced lawyers, ruled four to three that given the changes to the constitution it would be possible for women priests to be consecrated as diocesan bishops where diocesan rules allowed it.

Dr Aspinall said the ruling is a significant day in the life of the Anglican Church of Australia. “This means that whenever there are vacancies in dioceses that have adopted the 1992 canon and whose own diocesan law permits it a woman can become a diocesan bishop.

Women bishops are active in several Anglican provinces around the world but the issue has been the subject of much debate in Australia with some strongly against the move.

The Archbishop said the debate has been healthy. “The Anglican family across Australia is a diverse group and we are mature enough to engage in robust debate on many issues.

“There will be some in our family who will be unhappy with this ruling and it is now our urgent duty to offer care for those who retain a conscientious objection to women bishops.”

While the decision is a significant event the Primate again highlighted the important distinction made by the Appellate Tribunal in relation to assistant bishops. “This will not stop the consecration of women priests as bishops but ironically, as the law stands, there appears to be an impediment to women being appointed assistant bishops,” said Dr Aspinall.

Those with a mind to read the full decision can do so by downloading this PDF. Enjoy.

I think this is a good decision, and look forward to the consecration of the first woman as a bishop.

Archbishop Peter Jensen of the Diocese of Sydney has issued this statement:

The report from the Appellate Tribunal is contained in 79 pages including attachments. It requires careful study before we issue a considered response.

Initially I would point out that while I respect the judicial procedures which have led to this result I am disappointed that the matter has now been resolved in this way.

Those who are opposed to this development base their objection on conscientious grounds as a matter of biblical principle. The innovation will inevitably create ongoing difficulties around the church for decades to come.

There are many people in all dioceses who, while they welcome women priests, will not agree that a woman should be consecrated as a Bishop. This is because the position of Bishop affects relationships with every parish and with every other Diocese.

I am also deeply concerned for those Anglicans in other dioceses who will have similar difficulties. It may be that the Australian church will have to look for some means of taking care of minority groups who are disenfranchised by this development. There is of course a model in the arrangements for disenfranchised minority groups within the Church of England.

I am aware that the opinion of the Tribunal will be cause for celebration and thanksgiving amongst many in the Anglican Church of Australia. I trust that in their understandable enthusiasm they will give consideration to the needs of those who find themselves still in opposition.

A good and fair statement, I think, with a reasonable request for consideration – I hope we see that too. It is unlikely that there will be ‘schism’ in the Anglican Church in Australia about this issue, as the record to date seems to demonstrate a good capacity for people to get along. Robert Forsyth, an assistant bishop in Sydney, gave an interview, which is worth listening to (mp3 file, you’ll need an application to open it, and it is quite large – 1.6mb).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: